|Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account||2018-06-19 07:22 PDT|
|Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap|
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0000134||Core Inform||Assertions and creations||public||2010-06-27 01:32||2010-10-28 00:30|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version||6F95|
|Summary||0000134: conditions with multiple "when" don't work anymore|
|Description||In 5Z71 it was possible to write several "when" for expressing a rule with multiple conditions.|
"Instead of exiting when the location is lounge and when Rob is in location, say ..."
Having multiple "when" was helping for intellectually separating the different conditions. Since 6E59, when using this kind of syntax, we get those errors:
"Problem. In the sentence 'Instead of exiting when the location is lounge and when Rob is in location' , it looks as if you intend 'when Rob is in location' to be a condition, but that would mean applying the containment relation (between an object and an object) to kinds of value which do not fit - something unrecognised and an object - so this must be incorrect. Problem. You wrote 'Instead of exiting when the location is lounge and when Rob is in location' , which seems to introduce a rule taking effect only 'when the location is lounge and when Rob is in location'. But this condition did not make sense, so I am unable to accept this rule. "
The code must be written like this now: "Instead of exiting when the location is lounge and Rob is in location, say..."
if you intented to remove this syntax, the error message could be more clear, such as "you can't use two whens in conjunction."
On the other hand, having multiple "when" make the source code more readable in my opinion.
|Minimal Source Text To Reproduce|
Lounge is a room. Rob is a man in lounge. Instead of exiting when the location is lounge and when Rob is in location, say "It wouldn't be polite to leave now.".
|Additional Information||issue discussed there on the forum: http://www.intfiction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1187 [^]|
|Tags||conditions, conjunction, when|
|Effect||(cosmetic) Error message is badly worded|
|A better form of this problem message has been added to catch this case and give a clearer explanation of it.|
|2010-06-27 01:32||farvardin||New Issue|
|2010-06-27 01:32||farvardin||Tag Attached: conditions|
|2010-06-27 01:32||farvardin||Tag Attached: conjunction|
|2010-06-27 01:32||farvardin||Tag Attached: when|
|2010-06-27 02:11||jmcgrew||Priority||low => normal|
|2010-06-27 02:11||jmcgrew||Status||new => acknowledged|
|2010-06-27 02:11||jmcgrew||OS||any =>|
|2010-06-27 02:11||jmcgrew||OS Version||any =>|
|2010-06-28 13:03||EmacsUser||Status||acknowledged => confirmed|
|2010-08-31 12:27||graham||Note Added: 0000469|
|2010-08-31 12:27||graham||Status||confirmed => resolved|
|2010-08-31 12:27||graham||Resolution||open => fixed|
|2010-08-31 12:27||graham||Assigned To||=> graham|
|2010-10-25 21:14||jmcgrew||Fixed in Version||=> 6F95|
|2010-10-28 00:30||jmcgrew||Status||resolved => closed|
|Copyright © 2000 - 2010 MantisBT Group|